विज्ञापन • ADVERTISEMENT
Home/national/Video: 'Hard to Tell Real Journalists from Reel Makers', Centre Tells Supreme Court
national

Video: 'Hard to Tell Real Journalists from Reel Makers', Centre Tells Supreme Court

During a hearing in the Supreme Court regarding alleged harassment of female journalists during protests, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that it is increasingly difficult in the digital age to distinguish between legitimate journalists and social media reel makers.

✍️
National Desk, The Freelance
Politics, Governance & Public Interest Reporting Team••34
🌐यह खबर हिन्दी में पढ़ें →
Video: 'Hard to Tell Real Journalists from Reel Makers', Centre Tells Supreme Court

A high-profile hearing took place in the Supreme Court concerning the alleged attacks and misconduct against female journalists during recent protests in the national capital. During the proceedings, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta raised a crucial point regarding the blurred lines between institutional journalism and digital content creation in modern times.

SG Tushar Mehta's Argument: Distinguishing Media from Content Creators

Arguing before the bench, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that in today's tech-driven world, anyone holding a mobile phone can claim to be a reporter. He remarked, "Many individuals carry microphones and claim they are recording news, but they end up posting it as reels on social media platforms. In such scenarios, it becomes nearly impossible to identify who is a genuine journalist and who is merely a reel maker."

Meanwhile, senior advocate Indira Jayisingh represented the affected female journalists, emphasizing that they were simply performing their professional duties when they faced harassment. She argued that journalists are entitled to exercise their fundamental right to work freely and urged the court to issue interim orders. Jayisingh also suggested the formation of an inquiry committee headed by a woman, comprising retired judges and police officials.

विज्ञापन • ADVERTISEMENT

Court Directives on Digital Evidence

Taking cognizance of the matter, the Supreme Court directed all law enforcement agencies to securely preserve CCTV footage and other digital evidence related to the protests. Private parties have also been granted the liberty to submit such verifiable digital evidence to the court.

Additionally, the bench issued notices on petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 172 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), which mandates citizens to comply with lawful directions issued by police officers, empowering authorities to detain or arrest violators.

Disclaimer & Credits

'The Freelance' does not independently verify the authenticity of the claims made in videos circulating on social media platforms. Video credits: Respective social media handles and content creators.

प्रायोजित • SPONSORED
❤️
Reader-Supported Journalism

Support Independent Global Journalism

The FreeLance is an independent media outlet without corporate or political backing. Your support helps us deliver fearless, unbiased ground reporting.

Related News

✍️

National Desk, The Freelance

Verified Editorial Desk

Politics, Governance & Public Interest Reporting Team

The Freelance National Desk provides round-the-clock, verified, and in-depth analytical reporting on Indian politics, governance, policy decisions, parliamentary affairs, and public interest matters. We are committed to unbiased, factual journalism based on verified agencies, official statements, and on-the-ground correspondents.

विज्ञापन • ADVERTISEMENT
विज्ञापन • ADVERTISEMENT