The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard the matter concerning Congress Nandigram bypoll candidate Milan Pradhan, refusing to interfere with the interim bail granted to him by the Calcutta High Court. However, the apex court granted liberty to the West Bengal government to raise its arguments before the High Court if Milan Pradhan seeks an extension of his interim bail or applies for regular bail in pending criminal cases.
Supreme Court Bench Hears West Bengal Government's Objections
A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana heard the case. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court had granted interim bail to Milan Pradhan until October 20 to enable him to campaign and participate in the counting of votes. The bypoll for the Nandigram assembly seat was held on October 6.
Milan Pradhan was granted interim bail by the Calcutta High Court in connection with six criminal cases registered against him in 2007. The West Bengal government had challenged this decision in the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the state's plea on September 30.
Solicitor General Highlights Serious Allegations
During the hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the West Bengal government, strongly objected to the High Court's order, citing the serious charges against Milan Pradhan. He stated that the accused faces severe allegations, including setting a victim's house on fire and planting bombs. He added that non-bailable warrants (NBWs) were also issued against him during 2007-08.
The state government questioned why no arrests were made despite pending cases of such a serious nature. Tushar Mehta alleged that FIRs were registered during the previous regime as well, but no action was taken as police officials and the administration allegedly shielded the accused.
Details Emerge During Nomination Filing
The state government informed the Supreme Court that the current administration became aware of the pending cases only when Milan Pradhan filed his nomination papers for the bypoll and declared the criminal cases pending against him in his election affidavits.
Chief Justice Surya Kant also recalled the historical violence in Nandigram during the proceedings, noting that it had severe and devastating consequences. The Supreme Court clarified that it was not interfering with the interim bail at this stage, but added that if Pradhan approaches the High Court after October 20 for an extension or regular bail, the High Court must consider all issues raised by the state government.
This report is based on court proceedings and legal updates. 'The Freelance' maintains strict standards of factual reporting.
