In a special Sunday hearing concerning the recent demonstrations and subsequent clampdown in Delhi, the Supreme Court has taken serious note of alleged violations of its October 9 order. The bench issued a show-cause contempt notice to the concerned Home Ministry and government officials, asking why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them. They have been directed to file affidavits with their responses before the next hearing on Tuesday.
Strict Directives on Metro, Internet, and Public Movement
During the proceedings, counsels alleged large-scale detentions, manhandling of lawyers, abrupt suspension of metro services, and internet blackouts during the protests. Emphasizing that personal liberty cannot be curtailed outside established legal procedures, the Supreme Court directed that metro and rail services must remain fully operational and internet access must not be disrupted.
The apex court also asked the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) to provide a layout of the stations where entries and exits were restricted. Furthermore, authorities have been ordered to review barricading across the capital immediately and ensure smooth traffic flow to minimize public inconvenience.
Removal of Section 163 Board and Next Steps
A significant issue raised during the hearing was the installation of a board outside the Supreme Court premises announcing the imposition of Section 163 of the BNSS, which lawyers argued was hindering access to justice. Taking immediate cognizance, the court ordered the removal of the board, reiterating that access to courts must remain unhindered for both lawyers and citizens.
Senior advocates debated the fundamental right to peaceful protest under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, questioning the legality of mass detentions and heavy-handed police measures. The Solicitor General defended the administrative actions taken to maintain public order. With all parties directed to submit their formal responses and affidavits, the matter is scheduled for further hearing on Tuesday.
'The Freelance' does not independently verify all claims circulating across various social media handles and news reports regarding this unfolding event. Image & Video Credits: Respective news agencies and official court proceedings.
States & Regional Bureau, The Freelance
Verified Editorial DeskState Affairs & Grassroots Reporting Bureau
Delivering verified, on-the-ground reporting on state governance, regional development, grassroots public challenges, and local administrative reforms across India. We are committed to unbiased, factual journalism based on verified agencies, official statements, and on-the-ground correspondents.